MS Physics

Contrary case one of them would eliminate all the others. Therefore, the primordial principle of the universe is neutral. The last milesiano thinker was Anaximenes, disciple of Anaxmandro, having blossomed in century VI B.C. For this, the universe (physis) is resulted of transformations of an infinite air (pneuma peiron). Of its book in &#039 chats; ' On the Natureza' ' , in them some fragmentos had arrived, beyond making use of indirect certifications. For this philosopher, everything is formed by air: the soul is air, the fire, rarefied air; of thick air the water results. In case that air if still becomes thicker, land or rock is changedded into. This theory has the great advantage to establish enters the diverse materials only one graduation in the concentration of the primordial element, air.

Anaximenes introduced with this thought a concept that would go to influence the future philosophies: he identifies the last constitution of the physis and identifies the process capable to create the multiplicity of all the things that they form universe. The new jnica school the new jnica school dedicated to reevaluate it the thought of its predecessors, basically developing its ideas taking for base the thought of Anaximenes. Amongst the philosophers of the new jnica school, whose references had arrived we, we have: – Ideo de Himera was born and lived in century V B.C., being almost contemporary of Scrates. Its ideas still deal with the subject of air, as primordial element of the physis. – Cleidemo, disciple of Anaximenes, developed research in the field of meteorology and the physics. On the other hand, Cleidemo developed a series of relative hypotheses to the directions, using the air concept as main element: the palate is resultant of air; the olfato and the hearing alone exist I smell because it and the sound is carried by air. – Enpides de Quios, that lived in century V B.C.

During the time of metaphysics, the history of the being is repassed by one pressed time essence. A space is not commanded nor parallel to this situated time nor inside of it. The relation that comes of metaphysics and that it looks for to penetrate in the reference of the truth of the being to the human being is conceived as understanding. The understanding is the played static project, wants to say, the insistent project in the scope of the opened one. The preface of Being and Time, in the first page of the treated one, locks up with the phrases: ' ' The concrete elaboration of the question of the direction of ' ' ser' ' it is the objective of the present work. Its provisory end and to supply an interpretation of the time as horizon of all possible understanding of ser' ' The philosophy could not bring easily a clearer test to be able it of the esquecimento of the being where all it disappeared? esquecimento that, however, if became and remained the challenge inherited for the thought of Being and Time? of what sonmbula security with that it passed for high the authentic and only question of Being and Time. Being that metaphysics says what is the being while the being.

Metaphysics if puts into motion in the scope of n He n. Metaphysics, however, represents the entity of the being in two ways: of a side the totality of the being while such, in the direction of the traces most general (n Kathlou, Koinn); of another one, however, and the same, the totality of the being while such, in the direction of the supreme being and therefore the holy ghost (n Kathtou, akrtaton, theion). a>. In Aristotle the desvelamento of the being while such properly was projected in this double direction (vide Metaphysical, books XI, V and X).